Simple and easy-to-use application for physical and chemical calculations
Total ratings
3.50
(Rating count:
74)
User reviews
Recent rating average:
3.14
All time rating average:
3.50
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-23 | S | Poorly designed UI. Tested w/ mirror focal length, entered value for r, hit calculate & it said "Determine what you want to calculate" b/c entering a value doesn't auto-select the radio button. Selected the radio button next to radius (since that's the field I filled, & normally with radio buttons the one next to the field you fill is the one you select) & it said "Enter value of element: f." Had to select the radio button next to f to get it to work. Very unintuitive & cumbersome. +Other issues | |
2023-03-02 | ॐ नमः शिवाय Om Namah Shivaya Let's start | It's unsecured because it's need full network access . It's now unsecured app. Spy app | |
2021-10-09 | Rhea Jane Tumog | Nice app | |
2019-12-22 | A Google user | Great app! | |
2018-10-11 | A Google user | Please add a scientific keyboard with the app. The textboxes just open the default numpad, which is not sufficient. For instance charge of an electron cannot be typed with 19 zeros. | |
2018-10-09 | A Google user | Concept is good but it has a long way before it becomes usable. For instance, while calculating the height of a projectile, why am i expected to write the value of g. It could have filled in the defaults. Also why should i indicate what to find, can't you just find all the missing ones based on what has been filled? And then those nasty errors that keep popping up. | |
2018-10-08 | A Google user | I like it |