Spades (Classic Card Game)
Your favorite card game
Total ratings
4.53
(Rating count:
24,236)Review summary
These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews.
Google Play Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate,
spammy, or outdated. Pros
- Simple and straightforward gameplay.
- Clean user interface without unnecessary animations.
- Easy to learn for new players.
- Fast-paced gaming experience.
Cons
- AI partner frequently makes poor decisions.
- High frequency of ads after every hand.
- Lack of customizable game rules.
- Bidding slider and mechanics are awkward.
Most mentioned
- AI partner cuts books and plays incorrectly.
- Game lacks explanation of rules.
- Opponents seem to have an advantage with the dealt cards.
Upgrade to see all 22 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
3.10
All time rating average:
4.53
Upgrade to see all 22 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-15 |  | | It's spades, and the ads are only after a full match rather than every trick, nothing special, but the low level of ads makes it possibly the best spades app on the store |
| 2024-11-08 |  | | Hey look, a game that's the same as it is in the ad. What a concept. My only gripe is that it doesn't fully explain the rules. I keep losing points for seemingly no reason, and even after looking up the rules elsewhere I still don't understand why. This shouldn't be an issue. I get wanting the game to be beat, but you should at least include an explanation of the rules somewhere for if I need to look at them. |
| 2024-10-31 |  | | the AI sometimes makes some sdrawkcab moves, but the interface is super clean, the game is exactly what you want, and the ads aren't too intrusive. |
| 2024-10-09 |  | | Terrible. Horrible game play. This is literally the worst version I've ever played. Computer plays unrealistic hands to its advantage, but your computer partner plays like it has Down Syndrome. I feel like I got ripped off even though the game is free. A complete waste of your phone's available space. Zero out of ten, would not recommend. |
| 2024-09-15 |  | | It's simple and I don't feel overwhelmed. It's almost like playing with friends. I like bags being counted and totaling up for a deduction and it hurts to lose a 100 points. But that is real spades. I can easily hold my phone in a comfortable vertical position. I don't need bells and whistles, I only need comfort and stimulation of a good game. |
| 2024-09-12 |  | | Um, no. First of all, you can't even buy a version with no ads. So after EVERY HAND you have to watch a 30-second or a 60-second ad for another game. Who has time for that? On my second game, I lead the first round with the Ace of hearts, and my computer opponent trumped the trick and took it. Just because they had no hearts, not because it was a good move. Look for a better Spades game - trust me. |
| 2024-08-19 |  | | My partner sucks! I don't know what "intelligence" is being used but, when I bid nil and the partner leads low in any suit but has higher, that's just dumb. The partner does not bid well so know that you likely will need to take one or even two more to avoid going set. |
| 2024-08-19 |  | | It's an ok version. The gameplay is simple. However, the logic of the computer players needs work. For instance, your partner will default to take the book instead of trying to catch the opposing player on a nil bet. |
| 2024-08-18 |  | | This is a good game overall. The counting system is crazy. Nobody keeps count like that when you are playing for real. Besides that. There is no good spades player that would cut their partner when they have already won the book unless they are full of trump. The object of the game is to make your bid. When you cut out your partner you are automatically going against them and the object of the game |
| 2024-08-17 |  | | My app provided partner cuts my books all the time. Opponents gets the better hand all the time. Stats say I have played 245 games and have won only 68. Great way to learn BUT needs work on the back end. |
Upgrade to see all 22 reviews