Calculation of astable and monostable circuit
Total ratings
4.51
(Rating count:
2,344)
Review summary
Pros
- Very useful for calculating component values related to 555 timer circuits
- User-friendly and fun to use
- Practical applications for home automation and other projects
- Handy tool for electronics enthusiasts and hobbyists
Cons
- Incorrect calculations in astable mode (e.g., duty cycle, timing equations)
- Limited detail in calculations and restricted functions
- Annoying pop-up ads that detract from user experience
Most mentioned
- Usefulness for designing circuits
- Errors in calculations
- Issues with pop-up ads
- User enjoyment and engagement with the app
Upgrade to see all 20 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
3.50
All time rating average:
4.51
Upgrade to see all 20 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
2024-04-08 | joe woodchuck | I thought this was going to give me the component values to use for the timing parameters I want. Instead I have to work this app backwards to approximate numerous times until I get somewhere near what I need. | |
2023-11-29 | Glib Olive (ASHTRAIN) | First Class application, always refreshing experiencing. | |
2022-10-14 | Павел Переверзев | Oh my goodness! Amazing concept generous and concise. | |
2021-08-28 | GQ Electronics | This app is very useful and its very good result. | |
2021-06-27 | Al Wristen | Had enough circuitry using 555 to be instructive and useful. | |
2021-04-02 | Marc McLean | easy and fun to use | |
2021-01-07 | Rudo Strydom | There are a few mistakes. On astable t high = 0.69 (Ra+Rb) C, not 0.69 (Ra) C. T low is correct. T low = 0.69 (Rb) C Also on frequency f = 1.44 / (Ra+2Rb) C or 1 / 0.69 (Ra+2Rb) C, Not 1.44 / (Ra+Rb) C. In t high Rb is missing in the equation. In frequency, Rb is times 2. | |
2020-06-08 | Bit. Inc | Wrong calculation in astable mode duty cycle and high, low time | |
2020-05-30 | Kassim Abba Dandago | No detailed calculation. Constricted functions. Not fully calculable. You could have provided columns in which R1, R2 C, & % could be substituted to find a value or values. You deserve more star for your concern. I will be watching to add more stars, you have tried. Good luck. | |
2020-01-08 | A Google user | Hi i like it because from this i can use my experience to do more circuits |
Upgrade to see all 20 reviews