A KCPTUN client for Android, designed as SIP003 plugin for Shadowsocks
Total ratings
4.51
(Rating count:
314)
Review summary
Pros
- Can greatly reduce latency and increase bandwidth utilization
- More stable compared to previous methods
- Useful plugin if configured correctly
Cons
- Complicated setup for new users
- High battery consumption
- Frequent DNS resolution issues
Most mentioned
- Confusion in initial setup and configuration
- Problems with battery efficiency
- DNS resolution failures
Upgrade to see all 14 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
4.30
All time rating average:
4.51
Upgrade to see all 14 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Date | Author | Rating | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
2022-09-27 | Leo Kwok | very usfull plugin | |
2020-02-06 | A Google user | Good | |
2019-12-26 | A Google user | On Android 10 use this plugin error 255 libss-local exits too fast | |
2019-03-08 | A Google user | Use exactly the same settings, some phones also need notifications permission for BOTH Shadowsocks and KCPTUN, be sure to turn them on and allow auto-start and disable battery optimizations as well. Good luck. | |
2018-10-03 | A Google user | The great effort made by the developer to utilize kcptun to connect to ss server which greatly reduced latency and increased bandwidth utilisation. However it's a bit confusing in using at start. Remember to connect kcptun server port instead of ss servee port. Then follow the same format as demostrated in plugin to input your kcptun server parameters. Good lucm on your net surfing. | |
2017-11-06 | A Google user | Completely a mess. | |
2017-09-07 | A Google user | reinstall solved crash problem | |
2017-04-14 | A Google user | 搞定了只设置crypto &mode并按其他盆友说的改个服务器端口就行了。按kcptun的readme头两行命令执行是不需要nocomp的…… | |
2017-04-08 | A Google user | 可以提升性能 但耗电惊人! | |
2017-03-27 | A Google user | 很好。 |
Upgrade to see all 14 reviews