Secure PDF Viewer

Secure PDF viewer with zero permissions required

Total ratings

4.40 (Rating count: 548)

Review summary

These summaries are automatically generated weekly using AI based on recent user reviews. Google Play Store does not verify user reviews, so some user reviews may be inaccurate, spammy, or outdated.
Pros
  • Security-focused app that does not collect user data or require unnecessary permissions.
  • Simple and clean interface without ads or microtransactions.
  • Ability to open password-protected PDFs.
Cons
  • Limited zoom functionality, making it difficult to read some PDFs comfortably.
  • Lack of swipe functionality to turn pages, requiring users to click arrows instead.
  • No search feature, making it challenging to navigate longer documents.
Most mentioned
  • Zoom capability is inadequate.
  • Swipe to change pages is missing.
  • Privacy and security are prioritized.
See reviews for Secure PDF Viewer on Google Play Store
Upgrade to see all 22 reviews

User reviews

Recent rating average: 3.70
All time rating average: 4.40
Upgrade to see all 22 reviews

Rating filters

5 star
27% (6)
4 star
32% (7)
3 star
18% (4)
2 star
18% (4)
1 star
5% (1)
Date Author Rating Comment
2024-12-13
Singh
good but atleast give scroll up and down or swipe left and right functionality to navigate through pages
2024-12-02
LayLay McBadlux
Nice and easy to use. Peace of mind that my documents aren't seen by a 3rd party. Thank you
2024-11-17
Adrian G
Great to see a security focused PDF viewer. Would love to see swipe to change page, and a few more options to zoom and auto fit to screen.
2024-10-24
Fritz Mueller
Swipe over the pages to turn them function is missing . To touch the arrow each time is not convenient
2024-09-26
Rob A.
Lacks basic functions. I can't zoom in enough on most PDFs to read comfortably. No search and not being able to swipe are painful on any pdf with 20+ pages. Privacy doesnt matter when the app sucks. I just read some posts from devs explaining why you can't zoom very much. Guess what, no one cares, just make it zoom and swipe and search like every other PDF viewer in existence.
2024-06-26
S Smith
Only just installed so maybe more thoughts later:A great idea-I admire your project,but main issue,it won't zoom as much as Adobe on some files,so not ideal with less than perfect eyesight if using phone for most things-Please make it always able to magnify larger.Also slight 'jumpiness',tho unsure if maybe due to mobile signal(if required?)?Otherwise seems excellent for all my needs.So lovely to have a privacy-oriented pdf app.Adobe's new AI was last straw, so think I'll now switch permanently!
2024-03-03
Tony Wartooth
Deserves 10 stars. Its not going to be perfect for everyone, but it doesn't need any weird permissions and its not storing/ selling your data. Works as described. Their camera app is another good option for all the same reason this one rocks. Thank you devs.
2024-03-02
O Tal Do
It is awesome! The really only one downside on it for now is the zooming capability. You pretty much can't zoom a normal portrait pdf. Horizontal pdf can be zoomed. I guess this is a simple bug that should be fixed soon.
2023-07-30
Rishabh Dubey
i don't know why there are very few pdf viewers which provide mobile friendly pdf viewing. i want "liquid reading mode" of Adobe Acrobat pdf viewer in this app so developer please try to implement this feature. this feature also known as "easy reading mode" in a very well known app - xodo pdf viewer. I can use xodo but i want that feature in this secure pdf viewer because it is very lite open source app. so please 🙏
2023-05-24
Swim Fan
This was a good app that let me read pdfs and access the now hidden DocumentsUI default Android "Files" application. My only qualm was that it seems to access or expose the rest of my user private side of the file system on this Android 11 Device.. possibly why the docsui app was hidden and therefore not the developers fault here. It does what it's supposed to do though. If it were able to stick only to that one Chrome Download directory and not traverse it'd be better in this instance =)
Upgrade to see all 22 reviews